ALSO READ | India’s next pace generation gets its audition in Zimbabwe

That imbalance isn’t only about personnel. Few players in this set-up are certain of their spot or their role, and that uncertainty runs from the top of the order to the bottom. The danger is that a muddle like this rarely stays confined to the XI. It breeds an insecurity that shows in body language as much as in results.

Top order, unresolved

Start with the suspense that refuses to lift around Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli. As reported by this newspaper, selectors have already told Rohit he isn’t part of their plans. Yet at Lord’s, the 39-year-old showed he still has performances left in him. Kohli’s situation is murkier: his presence lifts the team, but he too remains unsure of his place in it. With two of the biggest names still uncertain, the unease at the top has set the tone for everyone below them.

With captain Shubman Gill locked in at the top, the only other opening option tried has been Yashasvi Jaiswal, who remains a back-up.

No settled No. 6

Move down the order and the uncertainty continues. Shreyas Iyer’s spot is locked in, but beyond him lies open ground. KL Rahul had been India’s first-choice wicketkeeper in the format for four years; in England, Ishan Kishan took the gloves instead. With few left-handers at the top, his inclusion looked less like a plan than a scramble to fit him in, and he was asked to bat in the middle order besides, a role he has occupied only once for Jharkhand, in the Vijay Hazare Trophy against Karnataka, when he made 125 off 39 balls at No. 6. Before the England tour, India’s team management had wanted Sanju Samson in the squad; the selectors turned the request down. Had they said yes, another question would only have followed: where does Samson bat?

At No. 5, India have tried Axar Patel and Washington Sundar. Neither has looked the natural fit for a role that needs a batsman comfortable swinging between aggression and consolidation, and comfortable with the semi-old ball introduced after the 34th over. The need for a left-hander at that slot, and for someone who can handle that older ball, pushed Rahul down from No. 5, where his numbers were excellent, to No. 6.

Since the Champions Trophy, Rahul has been settling into that unfamiliar role of finisher, a job that asks for power-hitting, which isn’t naturally his game. The thinking rests on trust in his batting rather than his hitting: that in the mid-30s overs, with five fielders outside the circle, he can manoeuvre the gaps and accelerate late. India don’t have anyone better suited to the job. They have handed it to him anyway.

At the start of Gambhir’s tenure, India also tried Riyan Parag and Rishabh Pant in these middle-order slots; neither is in the picture now.

The all-rounder gap

Then there is the seam-bowling all-rounder India cannot cover. With Hardik Pandya carrying injury concerns, the team has leaned on Nitish Kumar Reddy, another player whose body has not always cooperated. Pandya has not played since the Champions Trophy in March 2025 and has not bowled his full quota of ten overs even in domestic cricket. Without him, India go into the World Cup short a finisher capable of landing the late blows, a gap in the XI no one else quite fills. If Pandya isn’t fit, is anyone else ready? No.

Even the all-rounders head coach Gautam Gambhir favours come with question marks. Axar, Washington and Nitish add depth with both bat and ball, but none has shown he can win a match on the strength of either discipline alone. The numbers make the case on their own. Since the Gambhir era began, Washington has completed his full ten overs only twice in fifteen matches, and in six of those outings has bowled five or fewer. Axar has completed his full quota in six of seventeen matches; in all but one of the remaining eleven, he has managed at least six overs. Nitish has never sent down ten overs across six matches, his highest being eight, against New Zealand; against Afghanistan recently he managed four and six across two games.

This isn’t Gambhir’s fault alone. For years India have struggled to produce batsmen who can bowl a handful of overs, or seamers who can be trusted for 20 or 30 runs down the order. The all-rounders who do emerge from the domestic system tend to bowl spin, which is why the selectors keep returning to Washington and Axar.

In search of balance, India have also tried making all-rounders out of Harshit Rana and Shivam Dube, without success. Their new hope as a spin-bowling all-rounder is Harsh Dubey.

Kuldeep, and no one else

That leaves India without a wicket-taking X-factor in the middle overs whenever Kuldeep Yadav isn’t playing. England exposed exactly this: captain Shubman Gill admitted his side had to defend when the opposition spinners were on. In South Africa, where turn will be harder to find, Kuldeep’s wrist spin, and the bounce that comes with it, becomes still more valuable.

Beyond Kuldeep, the team management has looked at Varun Chakravarthy, but his fitness and fielding have kept him from being the answer they’re looking for.

Pace, and not much depth

The pace attack is where the concern sits deepest. With Mohammed Siraj currently out of the picture, India lean almost entirely on Jasprit Bumrah. Arshdeep Singh is only as effective as the conditions allow him to be. Prasidh Krishna continues to frustrate. Harshit Rana’s fitness remains well short of what the role demands. Bhuvneshwar Kumar, in a fitter attack, might have been in the conversation; he isn’t even part of it now. At the last World Cup, India turned to R Ashwin at the eleventh hour because they needed an off-spinner. In South Africa, Bhuvneshwar would offer something similar, and a batsman capable of contributing at No. 8 besides.

The plan to groom Rana, Prasidh, Gurnoor Brar and Prince Yadav hasn’t worked so far. But with Brar, there is some genuine hope.

The options exist. What India lack is the clarity to choose between them.

“Today’s innings was his answer. There was talk that he should be moved aside, but performances like this show why great players should be judged by what they produce on the field. Players like Rohit and Virat don’t leave because someone pushes them out.”

“They leave when they feel the time is right. Both have sacrificed plenty for Indian cricket over the years. They have rested when required, put the team first and continued to perform. That’s why they remain superstars,” he added.

Akmal also criticised India’s bowling performance, which saw them leak 387 runs in 50 overs, adding that they felt Kuldeep Yadav’s absence in the middle.

“Prasidh Krishna and Arshdeep Singh are experienced bowlers, but they both went for plenty. Gurnoor Brar conceded 97 runs. When your main bowlers are leaking 70 to 100 runs, it becomes very difficult to defend or restrict the opposition. India also missed Kuldeep Yadav. With only one frontline spinner, Axar Patel, they lacked variety. I thought Kuldeep should have played. His wicket-taking ability could have made a difference,” he said.

“India’s bowling lacked experience. They conceded more than 80 runs in the final five overs, and that proved decisive. Even though they fought hard with the bat, they were always chasing too much. India also looked a bit complacent. People kept saying they could field two or three different teams because of their talent pool. But if you look at this tour, from Ireland to England, they managed to win only one match,” he added.

4 min readUpdated: Jul 20, 2026 12:02 PM IST

India opener Rohit Sharma dismissed speculations of his ODI future, affirming that he remains fully committed to continuing in the role after smashing a record-breaking hundred against England at Lord’s on Sunday.

After an iffy start to the series with scores of 11 and 26, Rohit’s spot had come under scrutiny. The former India skipper had endured a lean run up until the series decider in England, scoring just 241 runs in eight innings, averaging 30.12 and a strike rate of 88.60.

ALSO READ | Rohit Sharma’s century at Lord’s came off Shardul Thakur’s bat

The Indian Express had reported that while Rohit remains determined in his role towards the 2027 ODI World Cup, the selection committee wants to give youngsters like Yashasvi Jaiswal, who has been waiting in the wings, a chance, in the forthcoming chances.